A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst potential neighbours over the construction of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek out to create their loved ones house. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted less than setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result spots are topic to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partially constructed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of the sea are the two hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable efforts from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn proof referenced within the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through waist-higher drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times, a picture which includes since turn out to be emblematic in the intensity in the dispute. These actions were not basically symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the water all through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Just about the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be aware of the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
In the core of your dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing documents, maps, and disorders hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it's about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple basically trying to make a family residence in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Location of Conservation and say that every one will work happen to be completed based upon professional suggestions and permitted designs. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting equally the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal solution.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket will have to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing circumstances. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who have to Reside alongside one another extended after the lawful charges have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. What's more, it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles like environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly Paul Feely crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. No matter whether it can eventually be altered, eliminated, or concluded as prepared will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.